Now Playing Tracks

The Monosexual Privilege Checklist

bidyke:

radtransfem:

I can’t believe I haven’t posted this yet. Click the link above to read it.

Tumblr, I know you like to raise certain objections when you read this list. I think many of them are unfortunate and miss the point. Of course, my followers are excellent and won’t make any of those mistakes, but just in case, here are some things to think about before responding:

  • Don’t say that monosexism doesn’t exist. In fact, why not read about a report which points out that, however oppressed a monosexual is, add “bisexuality” and they get to be oppressed more! Yey!

  • Don’t say that, because you as a monosexual don’t get a particular privilege or set of privileges, that those privileges aren’t linked to monosexuality. This is a list of privileges that, for some person or group of monosexuals, would generally go away if they had otherwise identical characteristics but were bisexual instead. No one monosexual has all of them.

  • Don’t say that, because some bisexuals may be able to sometimes access some of these privileges, that these privileges aren’t linked to monosexuality. This is a list more about general trends than an analytic proof which inevitably describes the condition of every individual. If you want to think about individuals (which I’d suggest is missing the point), instead consider whether an individual’s access to that privilege exists in any tension to their bisexuality, is based in any way on how others see their bisexuality, or in how they express their bisexuality.

  • Do remember that, in general, the less other privileges you have, the less likely you are to have a privilege on this list. Likewise, the more other privileges you have, the more likely you are to have access to these.

  • Don’t say “these are just straight privileges”. It shows that you haven’t read the checklist and the notes.

  • Do actually read the notes around the checklist and the discussions in the comments. Chances are they have covered any objections you might have.

All that said, I’m broadly monosexual, so while what I’m trying to do here is to stop other monosexual people messing up, I’m not immune to messing up myself. If any bi people working from within a similar framework to bidyke want to correct me on the above points, just say the word and it’s edited.

All that said: here’s the checklist!

<3 This is the one of the best commentaries I received on this post, ever ^_^

for those who have not read it yet (and REMEMBER to Read the Notes & Clarifications so you don’t end up make yourself look foolish in the comments)

So lemme get this straight, you’re in the monosexism and biphobia tags...

bidyke:

timelordtimeshare:

So lemme get this straight, you’re in the monosexism and biphobia tags saying that monosexism doesn’t exist and is homophobic and biphobia isn’t a big deal etc, and your big defense is: you’re bisexual… 

 Well, I’m bisexual too jackass and I’m of the opposite opinion, do we cancel each other out or what? 

Or are you just privilegeing your thoughts, analysis and experiences over everyone else’s because you’re one of the “good bisexuals” and not one of those mean old bi tumblr social justice warriors that rock the boat with statistics and critical thinking?

Literally the worst argument ever, try again, or don’t.

I think the bisexual biphobes phenomenon is disturbing, but also makes sense.

First - people who have only heard about the monosexual privilege checklist second hand, or who have read it without reading the disclaimers and clarifications around it - don’t actually know what it’s about.

I think that most people who have heard about it, heard about it on this level. Especially on tumblr, where like +90% is read-a-single-post-and-reblog. These people have no real reason to assume that the list is about anything other than gay and lesbian people, because biphobia is widely considered as an inner-community type of “inconvenience”. Very few people actually know about the terrible statistics and more structural forms of oppression working against bi people.

When people think about biphobia, they think “Oh, it’s the stereotypes/nasty attitudes we get from gays and lesbians”. Without a framework to think about this concept, people will fall to whatever they do know. They have no way of knowing that the list means something else completely.

Second - bi people have an interest in being on gays and lesbians’ “good side”. They do, in fact, get cookies for it. Their opinions are validated and supported by gay and lesbian people and communities, they are well received, and allow them to get ally cookies. Stepping down on bisexuals as a group is one of the quickest ways to get validation and support in gay and lesbian contexts, whether liberal or radical. It does and will get you points. So there’s the benefit in that - I think it’s a survival technique which allows some bi people to step into gay and lesbian communities on the backs of all bi people and communities.

Symptom of something that has been observed to happen all the time to many different groups who are under the thumb of a higher-status group, think popular tropes about Bitchy Female Bosses i.e. in “Working Girl”, “The Devil Wears Prada”, et. al. And this can happen even if the person/group themselves are Also Put-Upon, (see Julie Bindel for example). As has frequently been observed, “being a member of a despised minority group has not yet been shown to make anyone into a saint”.

(official bisexual) To-Do List

life-is-easier-in-a-bathtub:

06:00 - 07:00 wake up, shower, feed cat, eat breakfast

07:00 - 11:30 singlehandedly reinforce gender binary!!!

11:30 - 12:00 lunch - incl. lots of cake ‘cause I am greedy like that

12:00 - 17:00 reinforce the gender binary some more (because why not?)

17:00 - 18:00 dinner with myself

19:00 - 20:00 dress up as the attention seeking slut that I am

20:00 - 03:00 go out, trick somebody of the same gender into love, cheat(!) and break his/her heart on the spot (because bisexuals are not real human beings with real feelings but some kind of evil scientist robots who only want to experiment)

03:00 - 06:00 stare into the abyss, re-charge batteries

Repeat until World Domination!!!

bisexual-community:

we just want to point out that we’ve seen an increase in these (and other less literate) anti-bisexual comments of this type

not sure why, we wonder if it is becasue so many bisexual people are getting more visible — even in just unremarkable and you would think benign, ways like books, bloggers, films, videos, webcasts, and lots of pictures and cute memes — as well as getting assertive about being included and standing up for their rights, but whatever it sure has ruffled some feathers

but look here people equality is not a finite thing - it doesn’t run out - you won’t get less if others get some too

the fact that we promote bisexual writers does not somehow mean lesbian authors are throwing up their hands and and walking away from their typewriters; our posting pictures of rose lavender and blue cupcakes does not cause gay men somewhere to have their desert menu taken away; stepping up to talk about how serious issues effect out little corner of the world isn’t separatism, it means we are taking responsibility, we are being good participating citizens of the Queer Nation; having the B in LGBT start to wake up and stand up too can only serve to assist the in the greater struggle and to increase the good for everyone

bidyke:

[Image: Dark blue grunge background. First line text: “Did you know?”. Second line image: 10 people symbols/silhouettes, of which 4 are colored dark pink, and 6 light pink. Third line text (large): “over 40% of bisexual people have considered suicide”. Fourth line, smaller text: “By contrast, 8.5% of straight people and 27% of gay people considered suicide.” Fifth line: “STOP biphobia and monosexism!”]

The second in a series of infographics. For the first one, click here.

For more information, see: Snippet #4: The bisexual invisibility report
The second chapter in my book is dedicated to explaining the effects of biphobia and monosexism.

gotta love bialogue in here denying that lesbians are ever told...

palilicium:

gotta love bialogue in here denying that lesbians are ever told “everyone’s a little bit bi” bc there’s no proof except for, like, lesbians saying it happens who cares what they think?


may i remind everyone that bialogue personally passive-aggressively commented about me & other lesbians with:

so you get the rigidly conservative homophobe who chatters on (and on and on) about the minutia of gay male sex or the overly PC doctrinaire “gold star” lesbian who sees patriarchal conspiracies around every corner including in the most innocent comments made by anyone who is not “in” with their particular in crowd and the hipster slanguage they use”

kind of convenient for them to deny horizontal homophobia aimed at lesbians by other queer women when they participate in it.

OMG!! Look who has finally shown up on Tumblr. It’s the completely obsessively biphobic and transphobic crew who (along and their confused none to bright followers) have been desperately trying to silence all bisexual voices and force them off of ALL Mainstream Progressive or Lesbian/Gay Venues, since what’s it been … 2006-ish? 2008 at least.   

Several years behind the times as usual ladies, but nevertheless Welcome to the 21-st Century *waves*

You all will have to be kindly and understanding with them, they are a bit confused having spent several decades stumbling around the forest at MichFest refining their policies on who they hate (answer EVERYBODY Who isn’t just like them!!). Also they are not really up on such new-fangled concepts as “free thought”, the open exchange of ideas, listening and learning from people who are not exactly like you and giving a respectful hearing to those who’s opinions may differ from your own.

Another little tiny problem they have is that they think there is only ONE Bisexual Person in the ENTIRE WORLD … and they think that person is someone name is Bialogue

So they have for over a decade now Completely Misunderstood the concept of signal-boosting Books, Articles and Essays from Many Different Voices withing the world-wide Bisexual Community, (oh dear another scary hard to understand concept for them to be clear on). Not only is there is more than one bisexual person on earth … BUT we are not “properly ashamed” of who we area AND actually have a Community … not just wild orgies in seedy clubs or something.

And I guess they are going to be REALLY Even More Unhappy to find out that their great Arch-Nemesis is on Tumblr too - that’s right it’s that mastermind of Bi Queer theory the Radical Bi herself BiDyke!!!  ☺  

on not criticizing monosexism inside the queer community

bidyke:

tearingdownthatfence:

vegansexy:

kiturak:

so I know there’s a lot of awesome posts going around to which I can’t dedicate the time they’d need answering (and I want to answer, because I really agree and seriously disagree with most of them). To any other bi/ non monosexual…

That wasn’t rude at all. I think our personal lives and emotions are completely relevant to our politics. My politics deeply relate to me personal life and experiences, and the other way around - politics are deeply personal to me. In many ways, when I write about bi politics, I write about my life (and when I write about my life, I write about bi politics).

I also very much identified with what you said. I felt this was entirely, painfully, accurate:

I don’t want to numb my self to my lgbt siblings like I do with hetrosexuals, I want to help them and feel solidarity with them. But at the same time, I hate feeling automatically rejected.

Thank you for writing.

WARNING monosexism

the-nonbinary-bisexual:

tearingdownthatfence:

kiturak:

Just putting a quote out there, taken out ouf the utterly and completely unbearable discussion thread over at AfterEllen -

But I am a little over having this conversation with bisexuals who either are in opposite sex relationships, or romantically prefer the opposite sex.  We know they are out there, as they are the most visible of the bi community.   At this point, we’re recycling the same subject over and over again.

It would be more interesting to hear from bisexuals who are in same-sex relationships or prefer the same sex romantically, as they seem to be the invisible face of the bi community.

YOU KNOW WHAT I AM FUCKING OVER WITH?

LESBIAN FUCKING WEBSITES.

LESBIAN FUCKING MONOSEXIST CULTURE.

I am SO fucking sick and tired of y’all I can’t even.

The most visible??? In what fucking way omg

I mean of course we’re gonna have people in the bisexual community and leaders of the bisexual community who are in perceived-straight relationships

BUT we also have Robyn Ochs and Lani Ka’ahumanu, neither of whom can possibly be ignored when we’re talking about the bisexual community. They started the movement ffs. Of the newer crop we have Lauren Michelle Kinsey, who’s getting a lot of airtime over at HuffPo. And the scores of people whose relationship statuses I don’t know. But if all you see are bisexual women in different sex relationships then you’re not paying attention AT ALL.

Also you can’t just dismiss Faith Cheltenham because she’s in a relationship with a guy. What the fuck. I’m willing to bet that Faith Cheltenham has put MANY more hours and much more work into activism than that commenter.

This is really pissing me off and dear god do I hate AfterEllen comments. Or basically the comments on any big lesbian site let’s be honest.

basically what they do is practicing on a macro scale the monosexism most of us carry with us, internalized - is the (binarist) ratio still right? Am I a good enough bisexual? Do I really exist? It’s monosexism, plain and simple. Faith Cheltenham is amazing, and seriously, what kind of disrespect ist that - towards the president of BiNet USA in the comments about an interview with her? Like, can we also talk about this? How a bunch of commenters thanks the interviewer, saying how great she is for intruducing us to all of her fucking monosexist ideas before even getting to the interview part - and Cheltenham is neither thanked nor even aknowledged? And instead they’re making this into one of their good ol’ threads about how some bisexuals are just not really bisexual ( = lesbian) enough for them?

The bolded reminds me of this quote by Liz Highleyman,

Many gay men and lesbians maintain a firm belief in the divisibility of the world into those with same-sex attractions (“us”) and those with other-sex attractions (“them”); they may believe that these groups are fundamentally different and that their interests are necessarily and perpetually in conflict. Gay men and lesbians often build solidarity by naming heterosexuality and heterosexuals as the “enemy”. Some bisexuals readily accept the “us” versus “them” paradigm as long as they can convince the world that bisexuals — or at least the “good bis” — are part of the gay/lesbian “us”. […] Attempts by bisexuals to attend more meetings, stuff more envelopes, and donate more money to gay causes in an effort to “earn” the respect and recognition of the gay and lesbian community (a respect and recognition that gay men and lesbians are accorded automatically regardless of their degree of outness or activism) are ultimately futile as long as this clash of worldviews prevails.

God yes exactly. Marcie Bianco is getting a ton of credit and praise for

- mocking Faith Cheltenham for crying over bi erasure and oppression

- not apologising

- ostensibly doing this interview to make up for her shitty behaviour but really just continuing said behaviour

- writing a basically mediocre article full of prejudice

I mean, let’s face it. The only good parts of that article are the things Faith Cheltenham said. Everything else is crap. Faith said some intelligent, well thought out and highly quotable stuff there.

And yet the comments are falling all over themselves to praise Marcie Bianco and ignore or put down Faith Cheltenham. And they just keep on talking over bisexuals on bisexual issues, ignoring any input from bisexuals. Some of them, I really wonder if they read what Faith said at all or if they just skipped her responses to read some more prejudiced bs by Bianco.

I hadn’t seen that quote before but damn, that is accurate.

Ugh, I just generally avoid lesbian websites for reasons like these. Cheltenham did a fantastic job in the comments section, as well (but warning for those who might read them—quite a lot of monosexist talk about “gold star”-ness and identity policing). 

So she did. I just went through the comments a second time, just scrolling past all the horrible stuff. So now I could read what she says there in some kind of peace - and wow, she’s amazing.

Reblogging this again for commentary. Love you all.

Bi radical: The difference between monosexism and biphobia

bidyke:

Re: monosexism and biphobia. Do you use these words interchangeably? I notice more and more people are treating the two as synonymous and it doesn’t really sit right with me.

Personally, I don’t.

But before I answer, I have to clarify something first, because a lot of people seem to think I invented the word “monosexism”: So, while this is incredibly flattering, the fact is I didn’t. This word has been in use in bisexual movements from the 1990s or even earlier. I’m willing to take credit for popularizing it on tumblr, though :p

Now to my answer:

I see biphobia as a particular aspect of monosexism, they are definitely not interchangeable. Monosexism, as I see it, refers to the structural privileging of monosexual identities and behaviours. So, monosexism refers, for example, to the belief that one can only be either straight or gay, that it is better to be monosexual than bisexual*, that only monosexual identities are “real”, that monosexual issues are the only ones deserving of attention, etc. Monosexism causes bisexual erasure (from media, literature, art, TV and film, etc.), it causes discrimination when it comes to activist priorities, budgeting, etc. It causes the social isolation that leads many bis* to have poor health and mental health, and prevents proper treatment and support that might help alleviate them. It keeps bi* people “low” on the “pecking order” and creates all sorts of oppression. I see monosexism as the main factor responsible for all the horrible statistics in the Bisexual Invisibility report, for example. So, basically, monosexism is the system, the base structure. It is everything which isn’t directly aimed at bi* people but nonetheless has the effect of eradicating our existence or legitimacy.

I also have to say that monosexism is a structure that first and foremost comes from heterosexism and the patriarchy - 99.99999999% of it comes from heterosexual culture. So for me, monosexism is a term that allows us to look at all the ways that the “broader” culture creates oppression against bisexuals*. In addition, it allows us to consider monosexism as a structure that affects everyone instead of just bi* people - for example, by limiting other people’s options.

Biphobia, on the other hand, is direct negative attitudes and treatment of bi* people. It’s one specific result of monosexism. So here we can think about the many negative attitudes and behaviours specifically aimed against bis*. For example, when people refuse to date bisexuals*, when bis* are represented in stereotypical ways in the media, when bi* women become the target of sexual violence (because they’re perceived as particularly sexy sexual objects), when bi* people are discriminated at their jobs because of their bisexuality (for example, because they’re perceived as unreliable, flaky, unable to handle responsibility or commit to their job), and, yes - when bi* people are treated badly by L, G, and T communities.

I think it’s important to make that distinction, because these are two completely different levels of oppression working against bisexuals* - and of course, I think that the room that biphobia occupies right now in bi* political dialogues is unproportionate, and that we need to pay lots more attention to structural, heterosexual, monosexism.

[For a teeny bit more on that, here’s the snippet from my book where I define the two terms]

And I’m just gonna go ahead and make this rebloggable, because I think people might find that helpful :)

To Tumblr, Love Pixel Union